<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ask STC-Montreal: Humongous Word Documents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stc-montreal.org/en/2009/02/05/humongous-word-documents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stc-montreal.org/en/2009/02/05/humongous-word-documents/</link>
	<description>The source for technical communicators in Montreal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 21:23:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ev Larsen</title>
		<link>http://stc-montreal.org/en/2009/02/05/humongous-word-documents/comment-page-1/#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>Ev Larsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stc-montreal.org/en/?p=308#comment-564</guid>
		<description>A third option to try if you&#039;re really up against some file size constraints is to run your images through a flatbed scanner to convert the files to a B&amp;W format (if possible) or a scalable file type like jpeg that will allow you to play with size and resolution. You can then easily re-embed the slimmed-down images in their proper places and have a much smaller Word file as a final product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A third option to try if you&#8217;re really up against some file size constraints is to run your images through a flatbed scanner to convert the files to a B&amp;W format (if possible) or a scalable file type like jpeg that will allow you to play with size and resolution. You can then easily re-embed the slimmed-down images in their proper places and have a much smaller Word file as a final product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Gural</title>
		<link>http://stc-montreal.org/en/2009/02/05/humongous-word-documents/comment-page-1/#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Gural</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 01:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stc-montreal.org/en/?p=308#comment-563</guid>
		<description>Another quickie option is to export to PDF and then use the optimize PDF option. You&#039;ll have a lot of options for how images are compressed from within Acrobat Pro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another quickie option is to export to PDF and then use the optimize PDF option. You&#8217;ll have a lot of options for how images are compressed from within Acrobat Pro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Royal</title>
		<link>http://stc-montreal.org/en/2009/02/05/humongous-word-documents/comment-page-1/#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Royal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 22:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stc-montreal.org/en/?p=308#comment-562</guid>
		<description>Dear PG,

I don&#039;t know of a utility that can analyze Word documents the way you describe.

The best approach would be to save your Word file as a web page. Word has this quirk that when you save your document for web, all the graphics files are exported in both their original format and scaled for web output. You can then check the collection of images for the oversize ones.

I&#039;m assuming that most of the images in your doc are screen captures. In this case, you don&#039;t want to resize them, or else you&#039;ll loose details. But you can reduce their bit depth. Likely the screen caps are 24-bit. You can save them as 8-bit (PNG is a good format), and recoup some space that way.

Anther way to make Word documents that contain massive images more manageable (and less crash-prone) is to link the images to the Word file, rather than embedding them. This keeps the size of the Word file down, although you have to make sure that if you move the Word file, the image files move with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear PG,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know of a utility that can analyze Word documents the way you describe.</p>
<p>The best approach would be to save your Word file as a web page. Word has this quirk that when you save your document for web, all the graphics files are exported in both their original format and scaled for web output. You can then check the collection of images for the oversize ones.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m assuming that most of the images in your doc are screen captures. In this case, you don&#8217;t want to resize them, or else you&#8217;ll loose details. But you can reduce their bit depth. Likely the screen caps are 24-bit. You can save them as 8-bit (PNG is a good format), and recoup some space that way.</p>
<p>Anther way to make Word documents that contain massive images more manageable (and less crash-prone) is to link the images to the Word file, rather than embedding them. This keeps the size of the Word file down, although you have to make sure that if you move the Word file, the image files move with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

