With the growing development of the software industry in the 1980s, the need for a systematic and repeatable approach to software development has been identified.
The use of software development methods has been identified as a way to improve the development process, improve the quality of the product, and reduce the cost of maintaining it. In recent years, Agile software development has seen an increasing interest in both academia and industry. Despite the widespread use of Agile software development, the problem is a low degree of repeatability in implementation.
Considering the implementation of the methodology with the specific features of the projects is a major step in increasing the degree of repeatability in the implementation of software development methodologies. The need for structuring the knowledge used to implement flexible methodologies and the emergence of methodologies defining a repeatable approach to creating software development methods has been identified as a challenge to current research in Agile software development and a direction for future development.
There are many misconceptions as to what Agile is and what is not. In the following lines, I will try to explain to you what is the myth and what is true about Agile.
Fact: Agile cannot be applied to large-scale projects
Agile is designed for small, multifunctional teams that collaborate on the development and maintenance of a software product. The ability of teams that deploy Agile to break a task into smaller parts gives them an edge, especially with larger projects.
Myth: Agile is a panacea that can handle all challenges
Implementing Agile is not a good idea when it comes to projects that can’t be broken down into smaller parts that require a larger time span. It is also not reasonable to use Agile project management if an active customer or representative of the contracting party cannot be included.
Myth: Agile is another word for Scrum
Myth, but not quite. Both Agile and Scrum are not just methodologies by which the workflow is organized. They also include a number of well-defined technical tools for the task. In this case, Agile is a generic word for both approaches and their accompanying software frameworks. Scrum is a kind of Agile framework that is applied to extremely complex projects. In addition to Scrum, Agile has other approaches: Lean programming, extreme programming, hybrid methodologies, and more. So we can sum up: Scrum is Agile, but Agile is far from just Scrum. Read more about What is Scrum here: https://bvop.org/learnagile/scrum/
Myth: Agile projects are unstructured and chaotic
Compared to other organizational project management methodologies such as Waterfall, Agile tends to favor projects that are much better synchronized. Agile requires more discipline because an Agile project is subject to continuous review and can undergo significant changes, from the planning process to the final product. Work process development is monitored by well-defined stakeholder representatives who provide feedback on its progress and other details.